Placeholders in parser rules

Inspired by a question at StackOverflow site I started new subproject in NLT — a set of ready to use file readers. The first was PBXProj format and when writing the syntax rules for it I quickly became tired of repeating the same names over and over. PBXProj is rather simple format (similar to JSON), and the rules are short, mostly with unique symbols:

dict_list -> (COMMA- d:dict)+ { d };

But why introduce a name for an object when in code symbol name would be a perfect fit? You know, “opportunity” is just another name for the “problem”.

dict_list -> (COMMA- dict)+ { $dict };

Once NLT spots a placeholder it tries to bind it to symbol (symbol has to be unique and anonymous, i.e. without object name specified). Once it does, it adds implicit object name for the symbol and uses it in the code.

I don’t recommend using placeholders in long syntax rules, but in short ones it is the way to go.

Tagged ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: